Canara Bank v. coromandel indag product india limted
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debit Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai ordered IA 283/2020 (delay in representation) in Canara Bank's appeal against 3 Ors to be allowed and listed for further hearing.
What did the court decide?
IA 283/2020 (delay in representation) allowed and matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNA
IA 283/2020 (Delay in re-presentation) & IA 284/2020 (Delay) In
A.IR:84/2020
Canara Bank ... Appellant Vs Coromandal Indag Products India Ltd & 3 Ors ... Respondents
06/05/2022
Ld. Counsel Shri K.S.V. Prasad for petitioner/appellant bank and Ld. Counsel Shri B. Manimaran for R1, R3 and R4 and representing counsel for R2 are present.
This application is filed to condone delay of 10 days in representing the appeal.
Counter of R1, R3 and R4 and counter of R2 filed.
Advocate for R1, R3 & R4 represented that in both applications viz., IA 283/2020 (delay in representation) and IA 284/2020 (delay), same reasons are assigned and that he has filed a detailed counter in both applications.
Considering the submissions of both sides, without prejudice to the rights of both parties and objections raised in the counter to be decided in delay application, delay in representation is condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Coromandal Indag Products India Ltd & 3 Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court