Anandhi v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai allowed an application to condone a delay of 117 days in representing an appeal that was returned for compliance with office objections.
What did the court decide?
Application IA 201/2022 to condone delay of 117 days in representing the appeal was allowed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 201/2022 In
AIR 12/2022
N.Anandhi ... Appellant
Vs
State Bank Of India
... Respondent
30/06/2022
This Application is filed to condone delay of 117 days in representing the Appeal that was returned for compliance of Office Objections.
Advocate for Respondent Bank sought time for filing counter. This Application is only to condone delay in representing the Appeal, in which Respondent has no say, because it is between Office and Appellant.
Considering the reasons stated in the Affidavit filed in support of Petition, delay of 117 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. IA 27/2022 is allowed.
IA 27/2022 (delay in representing the Appeal) is allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.Anandhi
- respondent
State Bank Of India
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 331090000122022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court