Mayank Tomer & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Feb 2026TR.P.(CRL.)/30/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Correction of typographical/clerical error in a prior court order via correction application; Delhi High Court; TR.P.(CRL.) 30/2024; CRL.M.A. 5487/2026; erroneous case number 'CR No. 5761/2024' corrected to 'CR Case No. 571/2024'; State v. Mayank Tomar; FIR No. 306/2022, Police Station Anand Vihar; transfer of criminal case from Karkardooma Courts (Shahdara District) to Tis Hazari Courts (Central District); Prateek Jalan, J.; order dated 18.02.2026 correcting order dated 11.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Correction directed: the reference to 'CR Case No. 5761/2024' in the order dated 11.02.2026 is to be read as 'CR Case No. 571/2024'; the District Court case-status printout was taken on record. ¶¶17

Mayank Tomer & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Correction directed: the reference to 'CR Case No. 5761/2024' in the order dated 11.02.2026 is to be read as 'CR Case No. 571/2024'; the District Court case-status printout was taken on record.

¶¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the typographical error in the order dated 11.02.2026 — which recorded the case to be transferred as 'CR No. 5761/2024' instead of 'CR Case No. 571/2024' — should be corrected.

¶¶9

Court's answer

The discrepancy in the order dated 11.02.2026 arose from a typographical error in the prayer clause of the petition; the heading and body of the petition correctly refer to CR Cases 571/2024.

¶¶11

Ratio / Principle

The criminal case arising out of FIR No. 306/2022, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, stands numbered as CR Case No. 571/2024, as shown by the case-status printout from the District Court website taken on record.

¶¶17

Key takeaways

The correction application was disposed of with the direction that the reference to 'CR Case No. 5761/2024' in the order dated 11.02.2026 will be read as 'CR Case No. 571/2024'.ratio¶¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Correction application (CRL.M.A. 5487/2026) disposed of by the High Court of Delhi (Prateek Jalan, J., 18.02.2026) in TR.P.(CRL.) 30/2024, Mayank Tomer & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. The Court's earlier order dated 11.02.2026 disposing of the transfer petition had erroneously described the case to be transferred from Karkardooma Courts, Shahdara District, New Delhi, to Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, New Delhi, as 'CR No. 5761/2024', owing to a typographical error in the prayer clause of the petition. Relying on a case-status printout from the District Court website (taken on record), the Court found that the criminal case arising out of FIR No. 306/2022, Police Station Anand Vihar, is numbered CR Case No. 571/2024 [State v. Mayank Tomar], and directed that the reference to 'CR Case No. 5761/2024' in the order dated 11.02.2026 be read as 'CR Case No. 571/2024'.

¶1

$~79

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- TR.P.(CRL.) 30/2024 ( disposed of ) MAYANK TOMER & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶4

Through: Mr. Bhumit Solanki, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanya Arya, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 18.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 5487/2026 ( for correction of order dated 11.02.2026 )

¶9

The petitioners have filed the present application seeking correction of order dated 11.02.2026 passed by this Court, by which the captioned transfer petition was disposed of.

¶10

The error pertains to the number of the case to be transferred from Karkardooma Courts, Shahdara District, New Delhi, to Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, New Delhi, which has been erroneously mentioned as “ CR No. 5761/2024 ”, whereas it is, in fact, CR Case No. 571/2024 [ State v. Mayank Tomar ].

¶11

The error has arisen on account of a typographical error in the prayer clause of the petition which refers to “ CR Cases 5761/2024 ”, whereas the heading and the body of the petition correctly refer to “ CR Cases 571/2024 ”.

¶12

Mr. Bhumit Solanki, learned counsel for the petitioners, has

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

TR.P.(CRL.) 30/2024

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:54:13

¶17

handed up a printout of the case status from the District Court website, which shows that the criminal case arising out of FIR No. 306/2022, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, has been numbered as CR Case No. 571/2024. A copy of the case status is taken on record. 5. In view of the above, the application is disposed of with the direction that reference to “ CR Case No. 5761/2024 ” in the order dated 11.02.2026 will be read as “ CR Case No. 571/2024 ”.

¶18

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶19

FEBRUARY 18, 2026 “Bhupi/KA”/

¶20

Page 2 of 2

¶21

TR.P.(CRL.) 30/2024

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:54:13

Mayank Tomer & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayank Tomer & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Bhatia Vs Pooja Finlease Ltd.

Ashish Begwani Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delh & Anr.

Sumiti Kaur Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Shailender Kaur Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

State Vs Fazil and Ors.

Sita Ram Khadelval Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt Debasmita Chaudhury Vs Mr Rishabh

Yash Kumar and Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kuldeepak Mittal Vs Tycoon Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Pulkit Goyal Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kaushal Singh Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Mayank Tomer & Ors. Vs Sonal Singh & Anr.

Neeraj Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi