Davinder Pal Juneja & Ors. Vs Salma Begum

It is submitted that he has an independent decree in which the Respondent is the Judgment Debtor and therefore, his interest is impacted on account of Settlement inter se the parties and therefore, seeks permission to be impleaded as a party.

¶13

Merely because the Intervener has some independent decree against the Judgment Debtor, cannot be a ground to be impleaded as a party. He is neither a necessary nor a proper party in the present Appeal.

¶14

There is no merit in the Application, which is hereby dismissed.

¶15

The Intervener is at liberty to pursue his remedy against the Judgment Debtor in accordance with law.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2026 at 12:42:29

¶18

CM APPL. 32132/2026, RSA 168/2025, CM APPL. 66566/2025

¶19

Joint Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed to bring on record the compromise inter se the parties.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the Appellants explains that he had acquired the ownership of the Suit Property under a registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.1972 but the location of the Suit Property which is a kholki, was being disputed by the Plaintiff/Respondent and the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent for possession and mesne profits, was decided in his favour.

¶21

In the Regular First Appeal as well, the Respondent succeeded against which Second Regular Appeal has been preferred. Now, the parties have amicably entered into the Settlement whereby the Appellants had paid Rs.6 lakhs through Demand Draft bearing No. 329791 dated 22.04.2026, which has been handed over today.

¶22

The Respondent who is represented by her GPA holder-Sh. Md. Firoz, endorses the terms of the Settlement and undertakes that the rights in respect of the Suit Property are given up and that they shall not be enforcing any right under the judgment and decree. 10. The Appellant No. 1-Mr. Davinder Pal Juneja is present in person and as an SPA on behalf of the Appellants No. 2 to 4 in his favour.

¶23

The Settlement is endorsed by both the parties and they undertake to remain bound by its terms.

¶24

In terms of the Settlement, the Appeal is allowed and the judgment dated 26.04.2022 of the learned Civil Judge endorsed by judgment dated 09.10.2025 in RCA DH 53/2022, are hereby set aside.

¶25

The FDR of Rs.3.5 lakhs deposited by the Appellant in the name of

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2026 at 12:42:29

¶28

the Court be returned to the Appellants along with the interest that may have accrued on the FDR.

¶29

The Appeal is accordingly disposed of along with pending Applications.

¶30

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

¶31

MAY 13, 2026

¶32

N

¶33

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2026 at 12:42:29

Davinder Pal Juneja & Ors. v. Salma Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Davinder Pal Juneja & Ors. v. Salma Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Stellar Dynamics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Intello Air

Kanta Udaniya Vs Daman Preet Kaur

Smt. Chaman Lata Bhardwaj and Ors. Vs Smt. Nirmal Devi

Paramjit Singh Khurana Vs Davinder Singh & Ors.

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs Pankaj Saini

Laxmi Vs UOI & Ors.