Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal v. Hemlata Tayal

Delhi HC13 Apr 2026RSA/15/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; RSA 15/2025; CM APPL. 3704/2025; Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal vs Hemlata Tayal; Regular Second Appeal disposed on settlement/consent; handover of peaceful and vacant possession within two months; mesne profits not to be claimed in lieu of possession; mesne profits recoverable on failure to vacate; both parties appeared in person; Neena Bansal Krishna, J; decided 13.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed on settlement: Appellant to hand over peaceful and vacant possession to the Respondent within two months; Respondent/landlord not to claim mesne profits in lieu of possession; mesne profits recoverable only if the Appellant fails to hand over possession. ¶¶15

Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal Vs Hemlata Tayal — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶15

Issue for consideration

On what terms the Regular Second Appeal could be disposed of regarding handover of possession of the premises by the Appellant to the Respondent. +1 more

¶¶11

Court's answer

In view of the Appellant's undertaking and the Respondent's consent, the Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties, under which the Appellant shall hand over peaceful and vacant possession to the Respondent within two months.

¶¶11

Ratio / Principle

The Respondent/landlord shall not claim any mesne profits from the Appellant in lieu of getting possession.

¶¶12

Key takeaways

If the Appellant fails to hand over possession, the Respondent shall be entitled to recover mesne profits.ratio¶¶14
The Appeal is disposed of along with the pending application.ratio¶¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Neena Bansal Krishna, J.), RSA 15/2025 with CM APPL. 3704/2025, decided 13.04.2026: Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal (Appellant, in person) versus Hemlata Tayal (Respondent, in person). With written submissions (directed by Order dated 21.01.2025) not filed, the Respondent endorsed that she would not press for recovery of mesne profits if the Appellant handed over possession, and the Appellant undertook to vacate the premises within 02 months. The Regular Second Appeal was disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties: the Appellant to hand over peaceful and vacant possession to the Respondent within two months; the Respondent/landlord not to claim any mesne profits in lieu of getting possession; and, in case the Appellant fails to hand over possession, the Respondent to be entitled to recover mesne profits. The pending application was disposed of along with the Appeal.

Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal v. Hemlata Tayal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Garg @ Rajesh Aggarwal v. Hemlata Tayal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rani Promoter Private Limited Vs Rajeev Kumar

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Devansh Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Mohd Abid and Anr. Vs Rajesh Kumar Jain

State NCT of Delhi Vs Shiv Shanker

Promodome Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nehru Yuva Kendra Sanghathan

Sh. Jatin Khatri Vs Sh. Shyam Pahuja & Anr.