Dismissed¶14
Mr. Subhash Kumar v. Ms. Santosh
Delhi HCRSA/139/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal RSA 139/2022, High Court of Delhi, decided 25.04.2026 by Neena Bansal Krishna, J. Appellant Subhash Kumar absent (Through: None); respondent Santosh represented by Sumedha Verma and Mahender Singh, Advocates. Counsel for respondent stated possession of the Suit Property already taken. Appeal and CM APPLs. 48877/2022, 18977/2023, 54294/2023, 54295/2023 dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. No statute or precedent cited; no substantive issue adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal as well as the Applications were dismissed in default and for non-prosecution, none being present on behalf of the Appellant. ¶14