Dismissed¶19

Devidayal and Mahindra Cable Industries & Ors. v. Kdi Power Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC20 Mar 2026RFA(COMM)/622/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA(COMM) 622/2025; CM APPL. 69787/2025; Devidayal and Mahindra Cable Industries & Ors. v. KDI Power Pvt. Ltd.; High Court of Delhi; V. Kameswar Rao and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.; order dated 20.03.2026; reference to conciliation on 26.11.2025; Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre; settlement agreement dated 24.12.2025; entire claim settled; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; decree dated 23.05.2025 in CS (Comm.) no. 312/2022 stands satisfied; pending application dismissed as infructuous; commercial appeal resolved by settlement.

What did the court decide?

The court took on record the settlement agreement dated 24.12.2025 signed by both parties and their counsel. ¶18

Devidayal and Mahindra Cable Industries & Ors. Vs Kdi Power Pvt. Ltd. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA(COMM) 622/2025 CM APPL. 69787/2025

¶4

DEVIDAYAL AND MAHINDRA CABLE INDUSTRIES & ORS.

¶5

.....APPELLANTS

¶6

Through: Mr. Tarun Kashyap, Adv.

¶7

versus

¶8

KDI POWER PVT. LTD.

¶9

.....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Parvesh Bansal and Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advs.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶11

O R D E R % 20.03.2026

¶12

On 26.11.2025, we had referred the parties to Conciliation process under the ages of the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. The Centre has filed a settlement agreement dated 24.12.2025. The same has been signed by both the parties and their counsel. Clauses 3 and 5 of the same read as under:

¶13

“3. In view of the present Settlement between the Parties, the entire claim of Second Party company against the First Party stands settled, the appeal bearing RFA (Comm.) no. 622/2025 which is pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court is rendered infructuous and shall be withdrawn on or before the next date of hearing i.e., 25.02.2026.

¶14

5. That the Appeal preferred by the First Party bearing RFA (Comm.) no. 622/2025, shall be withdrawn by the First Party

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:39:47

¶17

on next date or any date before the next date of hearing, in view of settlement and satisfaction of claim of Second Party. The Second Party further agree that the final order and decree dated 23.05.2025, passed in the suit bearing CS (Comm.) no. 312/2022 passed by Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, stand satisfied.”

¶18

We take on record the settlement agreement dated 24.12.2025. In view of the fact that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement, and in terms thereof the impugned decree stand satisfied, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the appeal.

¶19

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

The pending application is also dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶21

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶22

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶23

MARCH 20, 2026 rt

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:39:47

Devidayal and Mahindra Cable Industries & Ors. v. Kdi Power Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devidayal and Mahindra Cable Industries & Ors. v. Kdi Power Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Fuelco Industrial Corp. & Ors. Vs Raj Kumar Saxena

M/S Surya Sanitary Traders Vs Rekha Rohatgi

M/S Capriso Finance Limited Vs Pooja Agarwal

Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs M/S Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited

Mohd Shah Fahad Vs Raghav Nathani & Anr.

M/S Rohit Enterprises through Its Proprietor Sh. Rohit Gupta Vs Sh. Rakesh Kumar Jain

Shri Virender Kaushik Vs Satish Jindal

Balmeet Singh Kathuria Vs Sundipika Wahal

Chandra Farms and Nursery Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

Rasi Nutri Foods India Private Limited Vs National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India & Ors.

Maj Rahul Singh through His Wife Prerna Verma Vs Union of India & Ors.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ex Jwo Vinod Kumar Agnihotri (695516-R)

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ex Sgt Kishan Bahadur Singh 751051 R

Ramavtar Vs Union of India & Anr.