Dismissed¶19

Ireo Private Limited v. Phoenix Family Office Advisers Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC9 Apr 2026RFA(COMM)/500/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA(COMM) 500/2025, Delhi High Court, 09.04.2026, Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar: commercial appeal of IREO Private Limited against Phoenix Family Office Advisers Pvt. Ltd. (impugning District Judge (Commercial Courts)-01, Saket order dated 17.05.2025) dismissed as withdrawn following out-of-court settlement; Court fee ordered refunded per amendment to Section 16 of the Act of 1870 by notification dated 06.03.2026 (Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2026); all CM applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the settlement; Registry directed to refund the Court fee to the appellant in terms of the amendment to the Act of 1870 by notification dated 06.03.2026; all interlocutory applications disposed of. ¶19

Ireo Private Limited Vs Phoenix Family Office Advisers Pvt. Ltd. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~74

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA(COMM) 500/2025 CM APPL. 12130/2026

¶4

IREO PRIVATE LIMITED .....APPELLANT

¶5

Through: Mr. Sharath Sampath & Ms. Kavya Singh, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

PHOENIX FAMILY OFFICE ADVISERS PVT. LTD.

¶8

.....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Viabhav Chawla, Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Mr. Vipul Saini & Mr. Huzaifa Ibrahim, Advs.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

¶10

O R D E R % 09.04.2026

¶11

The instant appeal is directed against the order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Courts)-01 South District, Saket, New Delhi.

¶12

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that during the pendency of the present appeal, the parties have entered into a settlement and the same has been reduced into writing on 24.03.2026 under the caption of ‘Settlement Agreement’.

¶13

Learned counsel further submitted that since the parties have resolved the dispute by way of a settlement, the present appeal be disposed of in term of the said settlement and the Court fee which the appellant had paid, be

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:16:31

¶16

ordered to be refunded.

¶17

In order to support his claim that the Court fee in question can be refunded, learned counsel invited the Court’s attention towards the amendment that has been brought in the Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2026 by way of notification dated 06.03.2026, whereby Section 16 of the Act of 1870 has been amended.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent accepts the factum of settlement having taken place between the parties on 04.03.2026 and that the para no. 3 of the terms of settlement enjoins upon the appellant to withdraw the appeal.

¶19

Thus, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the settlement.

¶20

The Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the appellant in terms of the amendment brought into the Act of 1870 by way of notification dated 06.03.2026.

¶21

Ordered accordingly. All interlocutory applications are disposed of.

¶22

DINESH MEHTA, J

¶23

VINOD KUMAR, J

¶24

APRIL 9, 2026/ sr

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:16:31

Ireo Private Limited v. Phoenix Family Office Advisers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ireo Private Limited v. Phoenix Family Office Advisers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Klick India Reality Associate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.. Vs M/S S.K. Enterprises

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs Pawan Gupta (Huf)

Hll Infra Tech Services Ltd. Vs M/S Medfreshe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Krishan Chawla Vs Sanjeev Jain and Ors.

Indu Bala Gupta Vs Ramesh Bahl H.U.F

M/S Modern Construction Co. Delhi Vs M/S Hitech Enterprises & Anr.

Vishwaguru Education Academy LLP and Ors. Vs Lfx Technologies Private Limited

Pankaj Sharma Vs Mars Distributions

Aabid Ali Khan Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S Klick India Reality Associate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.. Vs M/S S.K. Enterprises

Strategic Developers Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Harminder Singh Chadha Vs Pcit Delhi 4 and Anr.

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 1 Vs Ms Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Pawani Bai Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 19 Delhi