Mark D Martin v. Bird Execujet Airport Services Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Commercial appeal disposed of after appellant, having settled the matter with the respondent, sought withdrawal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
Commercial appeal disposed of after appellant, having settled the matter with the respondent, sought withdrawal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MARK D MARTIN .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Bharat S Kumar, Advocate
versus
BIRD EXECUJET AIRPORT SERVICES PVT LTD
.....RESPONDENT Through: Appearance not given
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 22, 2026/ rhc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2026 at 12:49:21
MARK D MARTIN
BIRD EXECUJET AIRPORT SERVICES PVT LTD
V. KAMESWAR RAO
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court