The High Court of Delhi dismissed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 5114-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the submitted grounds irrelevant to the delay.
The application for condonation of delay is dismissed; consequently, the appealed order along with pending applications stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Pulak Gupta Joshi, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocates for GNCTD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 20.07.2026
CM APPL. 64435/2025, RFA 951/2025, CM APPL. 35073/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:24:52
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 20, 2026 N
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:24:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 5114 days in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Brij Lal and Sons
Union of India
Neena B. Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
