8. The Plaintiff contested the Counter-Claim by asserting that the complete facts have not been disclosed by Sh. Ajay Thakur. She has been residing in the property since 1995; all her documents, namely, Aadhaar Card, Ration Card, Election ID Card, etc., are of the Suit Premises. All the averments made in the Conter-Claim, were denied. 9. The Respondents, filed t he Application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC seeking the possession of the Suit Property, from Smt. Kalawati, seeking Judgment of Admission qua the Possession of the Suit property. 10. Smt. Kalawati in the Reply to Application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, admitted that the Suit Property admeasuring 50 sq. yds. had been purchased by Sh. Budhram Thakur, father of Ajay Thakur on 02.02.1984, from one Jagdish, after which he came to reside in the Suit Property. Smt. Kalawati further admitted that she and her family, was residing in a rented accommodation, in the same locality. However, it was submitted that on account of the marriage of the daughter and other requirements, Budhram took Rs.5 lakhs from the husband of Smt. Kalawati and in order to secure the loan, he gave in writing that loan of Rs.5 lakhs which he had taken, would be returned by selling his own property and till then, the family of Shiv Prashad Chaudhary, would have right to live in half part of the property in question and also that till he fulfils his obligations, he would pay interest @ 2%. Further, in order to secure the loan, the original documents of the property were given to Shiv Prashad Chaudhary, husband of Kalawati. Kalawati and her family, since then, have been residing in the portion of the Suit Property. Her husband died on 24.12.2002.
