Dismissed¶25

Om Prakash Jangira v. Hari Om Jangira & Ors.

Delhi HC20 Apr 2026RFA/483/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; RFA 483/2009; Om Prakash Jangira v. Hari Om Jangira & Ors; Amit Sharma, J.; order dated 20.04.2026; withdrawal of first appeal on compromise/settlement; Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC; MOU dated 07.04.2026; site plan taken on record; respondent nos. 2 to 5 did not contest original suit; application allowed and disposed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal RFA 483/2009 dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of pursuant to the settlement (MOU dated 07.04.2026); withdrawal application CM APPL. 24292/2026 allowed and disposed of; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶25

Om Prakash Jangira Vs Hari Om Jangira & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 483/2009

¶4

OM PRAKASH JANGIRA .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr. A.K. Suri, Ms. Meenakshi & Ms. Sumbel Nizam, Advs. with Appellant Nos.2 to 4 in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

HARI OM JANGIRA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Mr. Khushank Singh Aloria & Ms. Shakshi Sharma, Advs. for R-1 with R-1 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 20.04.2026

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

CM APPL. 24292/2026

¶14

The present application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:

¶15

“In view of submissions made above, it is therefore, prayed that the appellants may, kindly, be allowed to withdraw the present matter as settled/compromised, in the interest of justice.

¶16

Any other relief (s) which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed, in the interest of justice.”

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence, the site plan which is part of the aforesaid MOU dated 07.04.2026, could not be placed on record. Copy of the same is handed over in the Court today and the

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:44:22

¶20

same be taken on record.

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent nos.2 to 5 had not contested the original suit.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 confirms the same.

¶23

In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.

¶24

RFA 483/2009

¶25

In view of the order passed in CM APPL. 24292/2026, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶26

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶27

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith.

¶28

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶29

APRIL 20, 2026 ab/ah

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:44:22

Om Prakash Jangira v. Hari Om Jangira & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Jangira v. Hari Om Jangira & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Komal Gola Vs Dinker Dev Handa

Kashmir Singh Vs Surinder Kumar Chadha and Anr.

Joginder Singh Arora @ Jugwinder Singh Arora Vs Rupan Jain

Ashok Kumar (Since Deceased) through His Legal Heirs. Vs Surender Kumar

Tui India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Krishan Kumar Singh

Ricky Kohli Vs Subhash Chandra Kohli and Anr.