Dismissed¶22

Silver Fern Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Aggarwal

Delhi HC17 Mar 2026RFA/421/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Default dismissal for non-prosecution of RFA appeal; Sections 96, Order 41 and 151 CPC; judgment and decree dated 06.07.2012 in Suit No. 01/12; stay conditioned on deposit of decreetal amount; CM APPL 19023/2012 variation application dismissed and stay vacated; repeated absence of appellant; court notice unserved ('left the address many years ago'); Silver Fern Hotels Pvt Ltd v Geeta Aggarwal; High Court of Delhi; Justice Amit Sharma; decided 17.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

The present appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly. ¶22

Silver Fern Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs Geeta Aggarwal — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 421/2012

¶4

SILVER FERN HOTELS PVT LTD .....Appellant

¶5

Through: None. versus

¶6

GEETA AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Manchanda and Mr. Mayank Nautiyal, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 17.03.2026

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present appeal under Section 96 and Order 41 read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:

¶13

“I. Accept the appeal by setting aside the judgement and decree dated 06.07.2012 passed in Suit No. 01/12 thereby dismissing the suit qua the appellant on the grounds as hereinabove. II. Cost of the appeal may please be also awarded in favour of the appellant and against the respondents.

¶14

III. Any other or further relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may please be also passed in favour of the appellant and against the respondents.”

¶15

Vide order dated 16.10.2012, the operation of the impugned judgment and decree dated 06.07.2012 was stayed, subject to the appellant depositing the entire decreetal amount. However, the appellant did not deposit the same and filed an application, CM APPL 19023/2012 , for varying the order dated 16.10.2012. The said application was dismissed vide order dated 03.12.2012, whereby it was observed that since the terms of order dated 16.10.2012 had

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:23:30

¶18

not been complied, interim order stands vacated and there is no stay.

¶19

None appears on behalf of the appellant today.

¶20

There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on 06.12.2024, 15.04.2025 and 30.10.2025 as well.

¶21

Report with regard to the Court notice issued to the appellant vide order dated 30.10.2025 for today has come back unserved with remarks “left the address many years ago”.

¶22

In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed in default for nonprosecution and disposed of accordingly.

¶23

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶24

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶25

MARCH 17, 2026/bsr/sg

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:23:30

Silver Fern Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Silver Fern Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs R a Sankra Narayan

Aarti Sharma Vs Deepak Sharma

Urvashi Singh Vs Anurag Singh

Nitin Tokas Vs Joginder Singh Tokas & Ors.

Harsaran (Deceased) Thorugh His Lrs and Ors. Vs Sh. Vimal Verma

Kavita Gupta Vs Sumit Gupta