Disposed
Rashmi Pandey v. Manoj Kumar
Delhi HCRFA/323/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appellant sought to withdraw Regular First Appeal No. 323 of 2022 and proceed with a subsequent appeal against the same judgment. The Court permitted the withdrawal of the present appeal.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of Appeal permitted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 323/2022, CM APPL. 32327-32329/2022
¶4
RASHMI PANDEY .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given
¶5
versus
¶6
MANOJ KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Mehra, Advocate
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 23.04.2026
¶9
- Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that there is another Appeal bearing RFA No. 386/2025 filed against the same judgment dated 25.09.2020.
¶10
- Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present RFA bearing No. 323/2022 and would continue with the Appeal RFA No. 386/2025.
¶11
- In view of the submissions, Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Rashmi Pandey
- respondent
Manoj Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Neena Bansal Krishna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court