Dismissed¶20

Anil Kumar & Ors. v. S.Daljeet Singh

Delhi HC6 Jan 2026RC.REV./371/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RC.REV. 371/2017 & CM APPL. 29318/2017, High Court of Delhi, Amit Sharma, J., 06.01.2026 - Anil Kumar & Ors. vs S. Daljeet Singh; petition under Section 25-B (8) Delhi Rent Control Act seeking quashing of Rent Controller (North) Delhi order dated 27-01-2017 in E. No. 246/2016 and leave to defend for tenanted premises D-1/6 Sardar Nagar, CC Colony, Delhi-110009; withdrawn on oral settlement, dismissed as withdrawn, pending applications disposed; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition granted upon report of an oral settlement between the parties; petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of; pending applications disposed of. No relief granted on the merits (no quashing of the Rent Controller's order; no leave to defend). ¶20

Anil Kumar & Ors. Vs S.Daljeet Singh — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether the Rent Controller (North)'s judgment and order dated 27-01-2017 in E. No. 246/2016 should be quashed and leave to defend granted to the petitioners under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. (Raised by the petition, but not adjudicated - the petition was withdrawn.)

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Leave was granted to the petitioners to withdraw the present petition, petitioner no. 1 having reported an oral settlement with the respondent which learned counsel for the respondent confirmed.

¶19

Key takeaways

The present petition was dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.ratio¶20
Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi (Amit Sharma, J.), order dated 06.01.2026 in RC.REV. 371/2017 & CM APPL. 29318/2017. Petitioners Anil Kumar & Ors. had moved this petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act praying (i) to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 27-01-2017 passed by Shri Sidharth Mathur, Rent Controller (North), Delhi in E. No. 246/2016, 'S. Daljeet Singh vs. Anil Kumar & Ors.', and (ii) for grant of leave to defend in respect of tenanted premises D-1/6 Sardar Nagar, near CC Colony, Delhi-110009. At the hearing, petitioner no. 1, appearing in person on behalf of all petitioners, sought leave to withdraw the petition on the ground that an oral settlement had been arrived at with the respondent S. Daljeet Singh; learned counsel for the respondent confirmed the settlement. The Court granted leave, dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly, and disposed of pending application(s). The Court expressed no view on the merits of the challenge to the Rent Controller's order or on the question of leave to defend; the order therefore carries no precedential value on those questions.

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 371/2017 & CM APPL. 29318/2017

¶4

ANIL KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Anil Kumar in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

S.DALJEET SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh, Advocate (through Vc).

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 06.01.2026

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, seeks the following prayers:

¶13

<(i) Quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 27-01-2017 passed by Shri Sidharth Mathur, Rent Controller, (North), Delhi in E. No. 246/2016 titled "S. Daljeet Singh vs. Anil Kumar & Ors."

¶14

(ii) Pass an order granting leave to defend in favour of the Petitioners and against the Respondent in respect of tenanted premises D-1/6 Sardar Nagar, near CC Colony, Delhi-110009 (iii) grant such other, further relief/s in the facts and circumstances of the case as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and equitable in favour of the petitioner.=

¶15

Mr. Anil Kumar (petitioner no. 1), appearing in-person, submits that he is appearing on behalf of other petitioners with appropriate instructions. He seeks leave to withdraw the present petition on account of the fact that an oral settlement has been arrived at with the respondent.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:37:38

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent confirms the same.

¶19

Leave granted.

¶20

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶21

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶22

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶23

JANUARY 06, 2026/bsr/sg

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:37:38

Anil Kumar & Ors. v. S.Daljeet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar & Ors. v. S.Daljeet Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daljit Kumar & Ors. Vs Sri. Anshu Prakash & Ors.

Vidya Parkash Gupta, Age 74 Years, & Ors. Vs Sri. Anshu Prakash & Ors.

Saurabh Bhardwaj & Ors. Vs Directorate General of Resettlement & Ors.

Surinder Verma Vs Suresh Kumar Gupta

Surinder Verma Vs Suresh Kumar Gupta

Umesh Nanda Vs Depinder Singh Dhesi & Anr.