Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of time for concluding arbitration. Respondent raised no serious objection; the court extended the period by three months as prayed and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
ECOM EXPRESS LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Naman Joshi, Ms. Priya Goyal & Ms. Aakriti Gupta, Advs.
versus
MIRAHBELLE NATURALS AND APOTHECARY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar & Ms. Rashika Ved, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2026 Ch
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/02/2026 at 12:51:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period for conclusion of arbitration proceedings should be extended under Section 29A.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ecom Express Limited
Mirahbelle Naturals and Apothecary Private Limited
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
