The Delhi High Court entertained a petition seeking an extension of the period for concluding arbitration proceedings. The respondents had no objection, and the court extended the time by six months.
The time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months w.e.f. 30.07.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
CNR No. DLHC010365652026
Through: Mr. Sidharth Sethi, Ms. Shreya Sivcar & Ms. Riya Singh, Advs.
versus
AMBIENCE TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED
& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. V Anush Raajan & Ms. Riya Mittal, Advs. for R1. Ms. Mallika Kamal, Adv. for R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 Ch
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 17:25:50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding arbitration proceedings may be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ESRI R AND D CENTER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
AMBIENCE TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
