Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of time to conclude arbitration. Respondent raised no serious objection. Court extended the period for conclusion of proceedings by two years as prayed and disposed of the petition.
Time for conclusion of arbitration proceedings extended by two years as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Mr. Hargun Singh Kalra, Mr. Shubham Bhati & Mr. Vidur Marwah, Advs.
versus
ABDUL AZIM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
O R D E R % 26.02.2026
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2026 ‘ha’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:21:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdul Waseem & Anr.
Abdul Azim
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
