Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act seeking extension of time for concluding arbitration proceedings. Respondent had no objection. Court extended the time by one year and disposed of the petition.
Time period for conclusion of arbitration proceedings extended by one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
SURENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.
versus
JITENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B.L.N Sanjit, Adv. for R- 1 to 4 (through VC). Mr. Vedant Kapur, Adv. for R-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2026/ ‘JK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:39:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding the arbitration proceedings should be extended?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SURENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS.
JITENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS.
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
