Appeal against a Family Court visitation order regarding summer vacation timings became infructuous as vacations ended; appeal permitted to be withdrawn with a request that a pending enhancement application before the Family Court be decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Shreya Singhal, Ms. Vijayrajeshwari, Ms. M. Keditsu, Mr. Kushagra, Advs. along with petitioner in person.
versus
POONAM RAWAT @ POONAM BISHT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Kumar Awasthi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
O R D E R % 01.07.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 11:07:08
issue involved in the present appeal has become infructuous, and only an academic exercise remains. In these circumstances, learned counsel prays that the present appeal be permitted to be withdrawn.
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J
RENU BHATNAGAR, J
JULY 1, 2026 /bs/my
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 11:07:08
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samrat Singh Rawat
Poonam Rawat @ Poonam Bisht
Vivek Chaudhary
Renu Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
