Methodex Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Terracis Technologies Ltd. & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Methodex Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Terracis Technologies Ltd. & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to the appellant to withdraw LPA 705/2025 with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025; all pleas, including the maintainability of the writ petition, left open before the learned Single Judge.

Issue for consideration

Whether the interim order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 10275/2025 could be dealt with in this Court, noting that ordinarily a Letters Patent Appeal against an interlocutory order is not maintainable and counsel contended the writ petition itself was not maintainable. +1 more

Court's answer

All pleas, including the plea relating to the maintainability of the writ petition, were left open to be taken before the learned Single Judge in the proceedings of the pending writ petition.

Ratio / Principle

Without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the rival submissions, the Court permitted the appellant to withdraw the present appeal, with liberty to move an appropriate application seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025 before the learned Single Judge.

Key takeaways

The Court observed, without adjudicating the point in this appeal, that ordinarily a Letters Patent Appeal against an interlocutory order is not maintainable.obiter¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi (Divisional Bench: Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia), Order dated 13.02.2026 in LPA 705/2025 (with connected CM APPLs.) — Methodec Systems Pvt Ltd (Appellant) v. Terracis Technologies Ltd & Anr.: Intra-Court appeal against the interim order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 10275/2025. Noting that ordinarily a Letters Patent Appeal against an interlocutory order is not maintainable, and upon the appellant's counsel requesting leave to withdraw, the Court — without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the rival submissions — permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025. All pleas, including the plea relating to the maintainability of the writ petition, were expressly left open to be taken before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition. The appeal stands disposed of. No statute or precedent was cited.

$~2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- LPA 705/2025 & CM APPL. 73095/2025, CM APPL. 73096/2025 CM APPL. 73097/2025, CM APPL. 73099/2025, CM APPL. 73100/2025

METHODEX SYSTEMS PVT LTD .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kush and Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advs.

versus

TERRACIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar, Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Ms. Rakshita Bhargava and Ms. Chinmayee, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 13.02.2026

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

This intra-Court appeal has been filed against an order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 10275/ 2025. 3. Ordinarily, a Letters Patent Appeal against an interlocutory order is not maintainable. However, learned counsel for the appellant states that the writ petition itself was not maintainable and, therefore, the interim order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge could not have been passed. The prayer for vacation of the said order, in our opinion, can be

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 12:36:03

made by the appellant by moving an appropriate application seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025.

Learned counsel for the appellant, at this juncture states that the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to the appellant to move an appropriate application seeking vacation of the interim order dated 23.07.2025.

We provide that all the pleas, including the plea related to the maintainability of the writ petition shall be open to be taken before the learned Single Judge in the proceedings of the pending writ petition.

The appeal stands disposed of.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

TEJAS KARIA, J

FEBRUARY 13, 2026

N.Khanna

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 12:36:03