Dismissed

Asha v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Delhi HC18 May 2026LPA/380/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against a Single Judge order; appellant contended she could not be heard before the Single Judge and sought to withdraw the appeal with liberty to seek recall/review of that order. The Division Bench permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal with the liberty prayed for.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of appeal permitted with liberty to seek recall/review of the Single Judge's order dated 05.02.2026; delay condonation applications disposed of.

Asha Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~72

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 380/2026 & CM APPL. 33597/2026 ASHA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Ujala Bishnoi & Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana TakiarStanding Counsel for Respondent No.1/Delhi Development Authority. Mr. Anubhav Gupta- Panel Counsel (Civil) for Respondent Nos.2 & 3/GNCTD.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R

¶7

% 18.05.2026

¶8

CM APPL. 33598/2026 (Exemption)

¶9

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

The Application stands disposed of.

¶11

CM APPL. 33596/2026 (Condonation of Delay)

¶12

For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 41 days in filing the Appeal is hereby condoned.

¶13

The Application stands disposed of.

¶14

CM APPL. 33599/2026 (Condonation of Delay)

¶15

For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 7 days in refiling the Appeal is hereby condoned.

¶16

The Application stands disposed of.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:17:53

¶19

LPA 380/2026

¶20

Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.

¶21

The contention made in this Appeal apart from the submissions on merits, is that the Appellant could not present her case before the learned Single Judge for certain reasons and though the impugned order decides the issue on merits, however, the Appellant could not be heard.

¶22

In the aforesaid view of the matter, in our opinion, it would be more appropriate for the Appellant to seek recall / review of the order dated 05.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge by moving an appropriate application.

¶23

The learned Counsel for the Appellant, thus, states that she may be permitted to withdraw the Appeal with the liberty to move an appropriate application before learned Single Judge seeking recall / review of the order dated 05.02.2026.

¶24

The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with the liberty as prayed for. Pending Application also stands disposed of. Pending Application also stands disposed of.

¶25

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶26

TEJAS KARIA, J

¶27

MAY 18, 2026 / ‘A’

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:17:53

Asha v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asha v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giriraj Enterprises Vs Municipal Corporation Delhi and Ors.

M/S Madhav Construction Vs Nbcc (India) Limited and Anr.

S.S. Saini Vs Punjab and Sind Bank

Anita Kumari Sihmar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sewa Singh Vs Neeraj Kumar Jindal & Ors.

Prashant Vs Union of India and Anr.