Intra-court appeal over a teacher education writ petition was disposed of by directing NCTE to file its counter affidavit within a fixed time, permitting the rejoinder, and preponing listing before the Single Judge per Supreme Court timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
MAHALA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Vineet Upadhyaya, Mr. Jayant Dubey and Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advocates. versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda and Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advocates for NCTE.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 15.05.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 12:11:19
be an impediment for the learned Single Judge to proceed further with the Writ Petition itself.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TEJAS KARIA, J
MAY 15, 2026 ap
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 12:11:19
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya v. State of U.P.Relied on
(2013) 2 SCC 617 · Who else cites this
Mahala Teachers Training Institute
National Council for Teacher Education
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Tejas Karia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
