Dismissed¶12

Satya Prakash Ravidas v. the Registrar of Societies & Anr.

Delhi HC12 May 2026LPA/350/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satya Prakash Ravidas v. Registrar of Societies & Anr., LPA 350/2026 & CM No.31623/2026, High Court of Delhi, decided 12.05.2026, coram Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya (CJ) and Tejas Karia (J); appeal against Single Judge's dismissal/refusal to entertain W.P.(C) No.60/2026 dated 28.04.2026 for non-disclosure of overlapping writ petitions and earlier LPA; appeal and pending application dismissed; no statutory provisions or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Nothing on record established that the prayers made in the Writ Petition were not overlapping and did not stand concluded by the Appellant's earlier proceedings; this supported the Single Judge's refusal to entertain the Writ Petition. ¶8

Satya Prakash Ravidas Vs the Registrar of Societies & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 350/2026 & CM No.31623/2026 SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....Appellant

¶4

Through: Appellant in person. Versus THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra & Mr. Amritesh Mohanty, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Anil Dutt, Adv. for R-2.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 12.05.2026

¶6

Heard the Appellant appearing in person as well as Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Amritesh Mohanty, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2.

¶7

The present Appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 28.04.2026 (“ Impugned Order ”) passed by the learned Single Judge whereby W.P.(C) No.60/2026 (“ Writ Petition ”) instituted by the Appellant has been dismissed.

¶8

The learned Single Judge refused to entertain the Writ Petition on the ground that the Appellant in the Writ Petition had not disclosed the filing of writ petitions and the Letters Patent Appeal, earlier preferred by the Appellant, for overlapping prayers. There is nothing on record which can establish that the prayers made in the Writ Petition were not overlapping and stood concluded by earlier proceedings.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 12:11:06

¶11

Accordingly, we do not see any reason to interfere with the Impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge.

¶12

The Appeal as well as the pending Application stands dismissed.

¶13

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶14

TEJAS KARIA, J

¶15

MAY 12, 2026 ‘gsr’

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 12:11:06

Satya Prakash Ravidas v. the Registrar of Societies & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Prakash Ravidas v. the Registrar of Societies & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Pvr Inox Ltd. Vs M/S Ocus Skyscrapers Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Unique Engineers Vs M/S Sikka Infrastructure Private Limited

M/S Eagle Hunter Solution Limited through Shri B B Pandey Manager Legal Complaisance Vs Ashok Kumar Tiwari

Vishwa Samudra Engineering Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Vishwa Samudra Kannur Expressway Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Sudhanshu Joshi Vs Union of India & Ors.