M/S Sawhney Export House v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court order dated 18.02.2026 dismissing ITA 1171/2005, ITA 1172/2005 and ITA 1175/2005 — M/s Sawhney Export House v. Commissioner of Income Tax — for want of prosecution. Keywords: dismissal for want of prosecution; appellant absent on 18.02.2026 and 17.01.2026; court notice returned 'unserved, no such firm/company/office exists at the given address'; appellant abandoned appeals; income tax appellate appeals; coram Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar; respondent represented by Vipul Agrawal (SSC), Harshita Kotru and Gauraang Ranjan; no substantive holding, no statutory citation, no precedent treatment, no monetary amount.
What did the court decide?
The appellant has lost its interest in pursuing the present appeals, as evidenced by the absence of any representative on the hearing date and the preceding date (17.01.2026) and the court notice being returned unserved with the note that no such firm/company/office exists at the given address.