Godaddy Com Llc Vs Burger King Company Llc and Ors. (Earlier Known as Burger King Corporation)

8. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall not press this appeal against the rogue domain registrants being respondents no. 2 to 4, 13, 24, 26 to 29 and 31. The submission is taken on record. Let amended memo of parties be filed.

¶15

9. Mr. Raunaq Kamath, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 has filed a brief statement on behalf of the said respondent, which reads as under:-

¶16

“Respondent No. 1, the Plaintiff in the suit, submits that, with all due respect and regard to the order under challenge and the steps taken therein to protect the

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:09:03

¶19

rightholders, it has no objection if the reliefs in appeal, as sought, are granted and the appeal is disposed of qua Respondent No. 1. The relief which was sought by Respondent No.1 in the suit and which has been granted is not under challenge in the present appeal. In the circumstances. Respondent no.1 does not wish to contest this appeal.

¶20

The plaintiff reserves the right to press for appropriate relief in accordance with law at the time of final disposal of the suit.”

¶21

10. In substance, the submission of Mr. Kamath is that the respondent no. 1 shall not be contesting this appeal filed by the appellant herein.

¶22

11. On this, Mr. Pradyumn Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time to take instructions.

¶23

12. This issue shall be considered on the next date of hearing.

¶24

13. Issue notice.

¶25

14. Let notice be issued to the other respondents through all permissible modes including e-mail. 15. List on 15.04.2026 before the Registrar for completion of service.

¶26

16. List before Court on 28.04.2026.”

¶27

Today the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 states that he shall not contest the appeal to the extent the challenge has been made qua the directions against the appellant. He also clarifies that the respondent no. 1 shall not seek the implementation of those directions in favour of Respondent No.1 in any proceedings.

¶28

The submission is taken on record.

¶29

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1, the learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal be disposed of. It is ordered accordingly.

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:09:03

¶32

The pending application is also disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶33

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶34

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶35

APRIL 28, 2026 rt

¶36

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:09:03

Godaddy Com Llc v. Burger King Company Llc and Ors. (Earlier Known as Burger King Corporation)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Godaddy Com Llc v. Burger King Company Llc and Ors. (Earlier Known as Burger King Corporation)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Supreme Industries Limited Vs Tarakant Sangwani

Loreal S.A. Vs Spv Laboratories Private Limited

Bar Council of India Vs Deayoung Jung and Anr.

Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs Vikram Singh

Godaddy Com Llc Vs Mcdonalds Corporation and Ors.

Namecheap Inc. Vs Burger King Company Llc & Ors.