Arbitration appeal dismissed by the Division Bench in terms of the Supreme Court's judgment in Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd., on the appellant's own submission that an award by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator cannot be sustained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Adv.
versus
M/S MAS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 17.02.2026
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J.
FEBRUARY 17, 2026 s.godara/kb
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 11:24:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is liable to be dismissed in view of the Supreme Court's judgment in Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India on awards passed by unilaterally appointed
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Airports Authority of IndiaFollowed¶2
Civil Appeal Nos.3738/2026
M/S Magus Consortium Orchid Avenue Pvt Ltd
M/S MAS Developers Pvt Ltd
Anil Kshetarpal
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
