Appeal against an interim commercial order was withdrawn so the appellant could approach the Single Judge under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC and Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Exemption application was allowed; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
M/S IDEAL MULTI MEDIA NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Farrukh Khan, Mr. Amique Khalid, Ms. Ruchi Gusain and Mr. Hitesh Lodwal, Advs.
versus
M/S CMYK PRINTECH LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 20.04.2026 CM APPL. 25636/2026 (for exemption)
FAO(OS) (COMM) 111/2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 12:45:44
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
APRIL 20, 2026/ msh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 12:45:44
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S IDEAL MULTI MEDIA NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED
M/S CMYK PRINTECH LIMITED
V. KAMESWAR RAO
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
