All India Tennis Association v. M/S Mccoy Architectural System Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC5 May 2026FAO (COMM)/170/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

FAO (COMM) 170/2022; All India Tennis Association v. M/s McCoy Architectural System Pvt. Ltd.; Delhi High Court; disposal of commercial appeal in terms of Deed of Settlement dated 02.05.2026 marked C-1; CM APPL. 30088/2026; release of Rs. 1 crore to Respondent from deposited awarded amount Rs. 1,03,32,446; Clause 5 settlement agreement; Registry verification; consequential directions; Bench: Anil Kshetarpal, Amit Mahajan; decided 05.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal FAO (COMM) 170/2022 and application CM APPL. 30088/2026 disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 02.05.2026; Rs.1,00,00,000/- to be released to the Respondent/Applicant from the deposited amount, subject to due verification by the Registry; Registry to take consequential steps. ¶¶23

All India Tennis Association Vs M/S Mccoy Architectural System Pvt. Ltd. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~53

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

FAO (COMM) 170/2022 ALL INDIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pruthvi Dhinoja and Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advs. along with Authorised Representative

¶4

versus

¶5

M/S MCCOY ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEM PVT. LTD.

¶6

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Tavinder Pal Sidhu, Ms. Neetica Sharma, Ms. Saloni Jagga, Ms. Poornima Gupta, Advs. along with Mr. Mukesh Chawla, Authorised Representative of Respondent.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶9

O R D E R % 05.05.2026

¶10

CM APPL. 30088/2026 (for taking on record the settlement agreement dated 02.05.2026 and disposal of the present Appeal in terms thereof)

¶11

Both parties, along with their respective counsel, are present in Court.

¶12

The present Application has been filed seeking disposal of the present Appeal in terms of a written Deed of Settlement dated 02.05.2026 [hereinafter referred to as „Settlement Agreement‟], annexed as Annexure-A to the present Application.

¶13

The Settlement Agreement is taken on record and marked as C-1.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:34:03

¶16

Learned counsel representing the parties submit that in view of the Settlement Agreement, no surviving dispute remains between the parties in the present Appeal and the same deserves to be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶17

It is further submitted that pursuant to the orders passed by this Court, the Appellant has already deposited the awarded amount of Rs.1,03,32,446/- with the Registry of this Court.

¶18

In terms of Clause 5 of the Settlement Agreement, a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore only) shall be released to the Respondent/Applicant from the amount lying deposited before this Court, subject to due verification by the Registry.

¶19

The present Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement, which shall form part of this Order.

¶20

The Registry is directed to take consequential steps in accordance with the Settlement Agreement and the directions contained herein.

¶21

The present Application stands disposed of.

¶22

FAO (COMM) 170/2022

¶23

In view of the order passed in CM APPL. 30088/2026, the present Appeal stands disposed of.

¶24

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶25

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

¶26

MAY 05, 2026 /sp/shah

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:34:03

All India Tennis Association v. M/S Mccoy Architectural System Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

All India Tennis Association v. M/S Mccoy Architectural System Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Insp/Exe Ranbir Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Geetika Vs Dsssb & Anr.

Trendy Security Services Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Yashul Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Maj Goldi Mishra Retd Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pawan Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.