This single-paragraph order allows the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal and disposes of the matter without expressing any opinion on merits.
The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITED .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Varun Sharma and Mr. Jayant Dayal, Advs.
versus
M/S SEPSET REAL ESTATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
%
20.04.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal as he submits that he would seek his remedies under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as has been permitted even in the impugned order.
2. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on merits.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
Signature Not Verified
APRIL 20, 2026 /aky
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Da te:2 1.04.2026 16:08:28
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited
M/s Sepset Real Estate Limited
C Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
