Brothers in a property dispute. The appellant sought leave to withdraw his first appeal with liberty to approach the Trial Court for attachment of the respondent's share in the father's property. Leave granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to both parties.
Leave to withdraw appeal granted with liberty to file application before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 388/2024 and CM APPL. 73665/2024
ADITYA MADAN .....Appellant
Through: Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Advocate with appellant in person
versus
SHOBHIT MADAN .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi, Mrs. Yogita Bansal and Mr. Manish Jain, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 12.03.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:08:19
merits of the case either way.
DASTI , under the signatures of the Court Master.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
MARCH 12, 2026/ na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:08:19
ADITYA MADAN
SHOBHIT MADAN
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
