Dismissed¶¶18

Gursharanjit Singh v. State & Ors.

Delhi HC22 May 2026FAO/347/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gursharanjit Singh v. State & Ors., FAO 347/2008, High Court of Delhi, Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, order dated 22.05.2026: dismissal for default / non-prosecution; non-appearance of parties and counsel on 18.12.2025 and 08.01.2026; appellant's counsel ceased to act in the matter; notice to appellant unserved (person not found at given address); Ms. Deepali Gupta, counsel for respondent no. 2 (Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee appointee), discharged for want of instructions; Mr. Varinder Pal Singh, respondent no. 8, in person.

What did the court decide?

The appeal (FAO 347/2008) is dismissed for default for non-prosecution, following repeated non-appearance of the parties and their counsel and unserved notices to the appellant. ¶¶18

Gursharanjit Singh Vs State & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO 347/2008

¶4

GURSHARANJIT SINGH .....Appellant

¶5

Through: None

¶6

versus STATE & ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate Mr. Varinder Pal Singh, Respondent no. 8 in person, Mob. No. 7678352055

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 22.05.2026

¶10

1 . Ms. Deepali Gupta , learned counsel appointed through Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee to represent respondent no. 2, states that she has not received any instructions in the present matter. She is discharged.

¶11

None appears for the petitioner.

¶12

The matter was taken up on 18.12.2025 and, noticing the absence of the parties and their counsels, it was re-notified for 08.01.2026. On the said date as well, no one appeared on behalf of the parties, whereupon Court notice was directed to be issued to the learned counsels for the parties.

¶13

As per the office report, the Court Notice issued to learned counsel for the appellant was returned back with the remarks that he was not looking after the matter and was no more counsel in the present case.

¶14

In the aforesaid backdrop, the Court vide order dated 25.02.2026,

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2026 at 11:25:12

¶17

notice was directed to be issued to the parties. As per the office note, the notice issued to the appellant has remained un-served with the remarks that no such person was found at the given address and no information could be gathered.

¶18

In view of above, the present appeal is dismissed for default for nonprosecution.

¶19

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶20

MAY 22, 2026 sn

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2026 at 11:25:12

Gursharanjit Singh v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gursharanjit Singh v. State & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Tyagi Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Smt Savita and Ors. Vs Union of India

Shishu Pal Singh Vs M/S Jaypee Vasant Continental Hotel

Yogesh Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. Vs Union of India

Prem Nath Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vijay Narayan Rai@ Vijay Rai Vs Mahaveera Transport Pvt. Ltd.