Dismissed
Sundari Sharma v. Poonam Sharma
Delhi HCFAO/319/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single-line order dismisses the filed appeal in default for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to deposit the process fee despite a last opportunity given.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~23
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- FAO 319/2024 & CM APPL. 58221/2024, CM APPL. 58222/2024 SUNDARI SHARMA .....Appellant
¶4
- Through: None
¶5
- versus
¶6
POONAM SHARMA .....Respondent
¶7
Through: None
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
¶10
- % 27.04.2026
¶11
- Upon institution of the present appeal, notice was issued on 03.10.2024. Thereafter, the matter has been listed on three occasions. However, the appellant has failed to deposit the process fee. On the previous date of hearing i.e., 09.01.2026, this Court, granted a last opportunity to take necessary steps.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sundari Sharma
- respondent
Poonam Sharma
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court