Execution-stage appeal under Order XLI CPC challenging dismissal of the appellant's objections under Order XXI Rules 66(2) and 90. Counsel sought withdrawal upon the court's indication it was not inclined to grant relief; the appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
SH BHARAT BAGDRI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Advocate (Appearance not given).
MS MANISHA & ORS. .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
JULY 20, 2026/tk/jk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2026 at 11:56:36
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against dismissal of the Order XXI Rule 66(2)/90 objections to execution should be entertained — withdrawn before decision.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh Bharat Bagdri
Ms Manisha & Ors.
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
