Disposed¶34

Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC12 May 2026CUSAA/54/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous disposal; Delhi High Court; CUSAA 48/2023; CUSAA 49/2023; CUSAA 52/2023; CUSAA 53/2023; CUSAA 54/2023; CUSAA 55/2023; CUSAA 56/2023; CUSAA 57/2023; Saint Gobain India Pvt. Ltd.; Asahi India Glass Limited; Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt Ltd; Gold Plus Glass Industry Ltd; Union of India & Ors.; customs; liberty to approach afresh; fresh cause of action; pending applications disposed; Nitin Wasudeo Sambre J; Ajay Digpaul J; 12.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of as rendered infructuous, as prayed; liberty granted to approach afresh in case a fresh cause of action arises; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶34

Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~39 to 46

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CUSAA 48/2023 & CM APPL. 36155/2023 SAINT GOBAIN INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi and Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aryaman Singh Chouhan, Advocates Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate for R- 3 Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶4

¶5

CUSAA 49/2023 & CM APPL. 36160/2023 SAINT GOBAIN INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi and Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aryaman

¶6

This is a digitally signed order.

¶7

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:08:45

¶8

Singh Chouhan, Advocates Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate for R- 4 Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶9

41 + CUSAA 52/2023 & CM APPL. 37515/2023

¶10

ASAHI INDIA GLASS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Chitra Y Parande, Advocate (Through VC) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi and Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aryaman Singh Chouhan, Advocates Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate for R- 3 Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶11

42 + CUSAA 53/2023 & CM APPL. 37517/2023 ASAHI INDIA GLASS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Chitra Y Parande, Advocate (Through VC)

¶12

versus

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:08:45

¶15

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi and Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aryaman Singh Chouhan, Advocates Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate for R- 4 Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶16

43 + CUSAA 54/2023 & CM APPL. 38404/2023 SISECAM FLAT GLASS INDIA PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishrra, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aryaman Singh Chouhan, Advocates Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶17

44 + CUSAA 55/2023 & CM APPL. 38418/2023 GOLD PLUS GLASS INDUSTRY LTD .....Appellant Through:

¶18

versus

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:08:45

¶21

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, SPC with Mr. Pravar Dennison and Ms. Urvi Tripathi, Advocates for UOI Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶22

¶23

- CUSAA 56/2023 & CM APPL. 38561/2023

¶24

GOLD PLUS GLASS INDUSTRY LTD .....Appellant Through:

¶25

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶26

¶27

- CUSAA 57/2023 & CM APPL. 38563/2023

¶28

SISECAM FLAT GLASS INDIA PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishrra, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advocates for UOI Ms. Reena Khair, Shreya Dahiya and Mr. Anmol Jain, Advocates for R-8 and R-9 (Through VC)

¶29

CORAM:

¶30

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:08:45

¶33

O R D E R % 12.05.2026

¶34

As prayed, the petitions stand disposed of as rendered infructuous.

¶35

Liberty is granted to approach afresh in case fresh cause of action arises.

¶36

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶37

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

¶38

AJAY DIGPAUL, J

¶39

MAY 12, 2026 gs/dd

¶40

This is a digitally signed order.

¶41

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:08:45

Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Customs Vs M/S Dsv Coload Clearance Pvt. Ltd.

Nawal Kishore Singh Vs Commissioner of Customs (Export)

Commissioner of Customs Airport and General Vs M S Entire Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

Principal Commissioner of Customs Vs Narang Machinery Store & Anr.

M/S Navalai Enterprises Vs the Commissioner of Customs (Airport and General)

Commissioner of Customs (Airport and General) - New Delhii Vs M/S Jbm Logistics

Commissioner of Customs (Acc Import), Vs Sunil Kumar Sharma

Senior India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex (Import)

Lakhendra Prasad Singh Vs Commissioner of Customs

Fateh Education Consulting Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner, Cgst Division, Wazirpur & Anr.

M/S Aerotech Fms Pvt. Ltd. (through Director Gurbir Singh Nagi) Vs Cbic & Ors.

Ms Max Healthcare Institute Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner/ Gsto & Anr.

Deepak Sharma Vs Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Govt of NCT of Delhi.

Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.