The plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit. The court granted permission for withdrawal under Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(a) CPC and disposed of the suit accordingly.
Suit withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
MS. POONAM PANDEY & ORS. .....Defendants
Through: Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advocate, DHCLSC for D-1 Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa, Ms. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Aiswarya Debardarsini, Ms. Jahanvi Agarwal, Advocates for D-5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 06.01.2026
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 06, 2026 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/01/2026 at 12:48:27
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
