Plaintiff No.1 appeared in court and submitted that she wishes to withdraw the suit voluntarily without undue influence or coercion. The Court recorded this statement and allowed the suit to be disposed of as withdrawn.
Suit disposed of as withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) of the CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
CNR No. DLHC010421422022
SHALINI KATYAR & ORS. .....Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Mansoor Ansari, Advocate, along with Plaintiffs Ms. Shalini Kariyar and Mr. Devendra Kumar in person,
versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 31.08.2026 Since 27.08.2026 was declared as a holiday, this matter is being taken up today, i.e., 31.08.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 13:41:24
disposed of as withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) of the CPC.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
AUGUST 31, 2026 Prateek
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 13:41:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit can be withdrawn as the plaintiff has no undue influence or coercion.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
