Disposed

Mohini Kukreja v. Jyoti Kukreja & Ors.

Delhi HC20 May 2026CS(OS)/475/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two suits and a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC seeking recording of a family settlement via MoU dated 11.11.2025. Court found the settlement lawful, decreed both suits in its terms, directed destruction of seized packaging material, and granted refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Both suits decreed in terms of MoU dated 11.11.2025; destruction of seized material; Rs.7,50,000 demand draft handed over; full court fee refund ordered.

Mohini Kukreja Vs Jyoti Kukreja & Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~70 and 75

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 1113/2016

¶4

M/S FARGO NICE COMPANY (INDIA) & ORS .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Natwar Rai, Mr. Sahil Arora and Ms. Aliya Parveen, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

MR. NISHCHAY KUKREJA & ORS .....Defendants Through: Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Mr. Sharan Mehta, Ms. Princy Sharma and Ms. Harshita Malik, Advocates.

¶7

¶8

- CS(OS) 475/2021

¶9

MOHINI KUKREJA .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Mr. Sharan Mehta, Ms. Princy Sharma and Ms. Harshita Malik, Advocates.

¶10

versus

¶11

JYOTI KUKREJA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Natwar Rai, Mr. Sahil Arora and Ms. Aliya Parveen, Advocates.

¶12

CORAM:

¶13

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶14

O R D E R % 20.05.2026

¶15

I.A. 11009/2026 in CS(OS) 475/2021

¶16

This application is filed jointly on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendants under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for

¶17

CS(COMM) 1113/2016 and connected matter

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/05/2026 at 12:38:44

¶20

recording of settlement between the parties and along with the application a Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement Deed dated 11.11.2025 has been appended.

¶21

It is stated in the application that along with the present suit CS(COMM) 1113/2016 is pending in this Court and CS (DJ) No. 1021/2021 titled ‘ Jyoti Kukreja & Anr. v. Gopal Kukreja & Ors.’ was pending before the District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts. After due deliberations and mutual understanding and with a view to restore family harmony as also to put an end to all disputes amicably, parties have executed an MoU dated 11.11.2025, whereby all disputes which are subject matter of the three suits have been amicably settled. In light of the settlement, the suit pending before the District Court has been disposed of recording the settlement. By this application, parties pray that the two suits pending in this Court be also decreed in terms of the settlement between the parties.

¶22

Court has perused the terms of settlement incorporated in MoU dated 11.11.2025 and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of recording the settlement between the parties.

¶23

CS(OS) 475/2021

¶24

CS(COMM) 1113/2016 & I.As. 18802/2015, 3370/2023, 6980/2023, 5958/2026, 5980/2026

¶25

Both these suits are decreed in terms of the settlements between the parties. Terms of MoU dated 11.11.2025 shall form part of the decrees and bind the parties thereto.

¶26

Insofar as the packaging material bearing the impugned marks, which the Local Commissioner appointed in CS(COMM) 1113/2016, had seized and is lying under superdari with the Defendants is concerned, Defendants

¶27

CS(COMM) 1113/2016 and connected matter

¶28

Page 2 of 3

¶29

¶30

shall destroy the same on 15.06.2026 at 02:00 PM in the presence of the Authorized Representative of the Plaintiffs. The exercise of destruction shall be videographed by both parties and the video shall be preserved. In furtherance of this settlement, Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.7,50,000/- has been handed over on behalf of Ms. Jyoti Kukreja to learned counsel for Mrs. Mohini Kukreja and others.

¶31

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheets.

¶32

Suits stand disposed of along with pending applications.

¶33

Plaintiffs in the respective suits are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870.

¶34

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶35

MAY 20, 2026/YA

¶36

CS(COMM) 1113/2016 and connected matter

¶37

Page 3 of 3

¶38

Mohini Kukreja v. Jyoti Kukreja & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohini Kukreja v. Jyoti Kukreja & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Rani and Ors. Vs Rajinder Prasad Singhal and Ors.

Smt Bimla Devi Vs Smt Sarvan Devi & Ors.

Mrs Shashi Singh & Anr. Vs Sorabh Aggarwal & Ors.

Tcm Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs Wildkraft Events and Promotions

Pulkit Raj Mittal Vs Ms Samrat Landscape Private Limited & Anr.

Shugufta Nabi Vs Haris Wali Khan & Anr.

Suparn Pandey Vs Gayatri Dahiya

Amcp Edutech Private Limited & Anr. Vs Rankers Gurukul & Anr.

Gurcharan Singh Vs the Controller of Patents

Biotyx Medical Shenzhen Co., Ltd. Vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Design

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Vs Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. & Anr.

Ims Learning Resources Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Young Achievers

Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte. Ltd. Vs Manju Kumari Wife of Sudhir Suman & Anr.

Lt Foods Ltd. & Anr. Vs Ss Enterprises