Makemytrip India Private Limited Vs Dialmytrip Tech Private Limited

% 04.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, the parties have been able to resolve their disputes and reduced the terms of settlement into writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2025.

¶11

The terms of the settlement between the parties have been enumerated in para 1 to para 18 commencing from page 3 of the Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2025.

¶12

Learned counsel for the parties draw attention of this Court to para nos.8 & 9 of the Settlement Agreement, according to which certain compliances have to be effected by the defendant within a period of 12 months. It is directed that the defendant shall issue a written intimation to the plaintiff about the compliances in respect of para nos.8 & 9 of the Settlement Agreement within 30 days of the expiry of the 12 months period. A copy of the said intimation and all compliances contained in para nos.8 & 9 of the Settlement Agreement shall also be filed under an affidavit before this Court too within the same time period as specified above.

¶13

Equally, as per the terms contained in para 4 of the Settlement Agreement, the defendant had undertaken to withdraw the infringing word mark Application no.6039656 in Class-36 for “DIALMYTRIP” and/or any

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 12:34:09

¶16

other Trade Mark application filed, which may be identical or deceptively similar to the mark of the plaintiff. The said compliance is to be executed within two months from the date of the Settlement Agreement i.e. 19.11.2025. 5. It is noted that since, no such application has been submitted to the Trade Marks Registry till date, this Court permits further extension of 30 days to execute and comply with the terms contained in para 4 of the Settlement Agreement. The defendant shall also intimate by way of a written communication to the plaintiff, the steps undertaken in terms of para 4. The order which may be passed upon such application for withdrawal shall also be intimated to the plaintiff.

¶17

6. Affidavit in terms of the compliances of para 4 shall be filed before this Court within two months from today. 7. The Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2025 alongwith all Annexure-A & Annexure-B are taken on record. The parties shall be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2025. 8. Having perused the terms of settlement and having heard the learned counsel, this Court is of the view that there is no impediment in decreeing the Suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement. 9. Let a decree sheet be drawn up in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2025 qua the defendant.

¶18

As requested by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the Court Fees be refunded under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 upon completion of all the formalities as per rules.

¶19

The suit is decreed and disposed of in the above terms alongwith all pending applications.

¶20

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 4, 2026/ kct

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 12:34:09

Makemytrip India Private Limited v. Dialmytrip Tech Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Makemytrip India Private Limited v. Dialmytrip Tech Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abbott Products Operations Ag & Anr. Vs Zealina Life Sciences LLP

Hilton Worldwide Manage Limited and Anr. Vs Hilton Holidays and Resorts Private Limited

D. Navinchandra Diamonds LLP Vs Sawhney Diamond Passion Private Limited

Tata Sons Private Limited Vs Vikas Choudhary

Pachranga International Vs Som Nath and Anr.

P. P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Durga Trading Company

Abbott Product Operations Ag & Anr. Vs Medinox Pharmaceuticals & Ors.

Hero Investcorp Private Limited Vs Ashok Kumar (John Doe)

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electrical Limited Vs Orient Electric Limited

Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs Mensa Futura Life Sciences Private Limited and Anr.

Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited Vs Uber India Systems Private Limited and Ors.

Hindware Ltd. Vs Marvel Ceramics and Ors.

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. & Anr. Vs Himcure Pharmaceuticals Private Limited & Anr.

Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited Vs Batra Brewries and Disttilleries Private Limited & Ors.