The Delhi High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit after counsel stated the design had lapsed due to the prolonged stay order. The court reserved the defendant's rights.
Suit permitted to be withdrawn. Defendant's rights reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
M/S BHIWADI POLYMERS LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani & Mr. Utkarsh Jha, Advocates.
versus
SMT RAJ RANI GUPTA .....Defendant Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 21.01.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:03:31
defendant from a cause of action in respect of any claim for damages or other claims. He also submits that his rights may be reserved.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 21, 2026 Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:03:31
Tushar Rao Gudelal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
