Suit seeking permanent injunction against use of the GI mark BIKANERI BHUJIA was resolved through a mediated settlement with payment of Rs. 51,000 to the plaintiff. The court found the settlement lawful and decreed the suit in its terms, granting refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
BIKANER BHUJIA UDYOG SANGH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Varun Kajla and Mr. Vikrant Malhotra, Advocates.
versus
JAGDISH PRASAD PROPRIETOR OF JAGDISH FOOD AND SNACKS .....Defendant Through: Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 18.03.2026
CS(COMM) 597/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 12:07:24
04.11.2025, incorporating the terms of settlement including payment of sum of Rs.51,000/- to the Plaintiff, which has been paid.
JYOTI SINGH, J
MARCH 18, 2026/YA
CS(COMM) 597/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 12:07:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit over alleged infringement of the GI mark BIKANERI BHUJIA could be decreed in terms of the parties' settlement agreement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bikaner Bhujia Udyog Sangh
Jagdish Prasad, Proprietor of Jagdish Food and Snacks
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
