Disposed

M/S Jay Plastic Company & Ors. v. M/S. Gurunanak Enterprises & Ors.

Delhi HC17 Feb 2026CS(COMM)/539/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suit over tag fasteners' marks 'ARROW' and 'SPARROW' and trade dress was settled between plaintiffs and Defendant No.1, who undertook to cease use and paid Rs. 1.5 lakhs as notional damages. Suit decreed in terms of plaint paragraphs 35(a)-(c) and disposed of with refund of court fees; connected appeal disposed of as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed per para 35(a)-(c) of plaint; Rs. 1.5 lakh damages; destruction of impugned packaging; refund of court fees to Plaintiffs.

M/S Jay Plastic Company & Ors. Vs M/S. Gurunanak… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 539/2024, I.As. 32167/2024, 32169/2024, 2573/2025, 13150/2025 & 18072/2025

¶4

M/S JAY PLASTIC COMPANY & ORS. .....Plaintiffs

¶5

Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S. GURUNANAK ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Defendants

¶8

Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mrs. Rinku Narula, Mr. Anugrah Ekka & Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocate along with Proprietor of D-1 in person.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 17.02.2026

¶13

This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, advertising or in any manner dealing with tag fasteners including tag pins and loop pins or any other allied or cognate use, using the impugned mark/trade dress so as to infringe Plaintiffs’ registered trademark and copyright among other reliefs.

¶14

During the pendency of the suit, Defendants No. 2 and 3 have already settled the matter with the Plaintiffs and suit has been partially decreed qua them on 15.05.2025 and 19.11.2024, respectively.

¶15

Plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 have also amicably resolved their inter

¶16

CS(COMM) 539/2024

¶17

Page 1 of 3

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:33:40

¶20

se disputes and it is agreed that Defendant No.1 recognises Plaintiffs to be

¶21

the proprietor of trademarks “ARROW”, “ and the blue and white box-packaging/trade dress

¶22

and consequently recognises Plaintiffs’ exclusive right to use the trademarks and the trade dress. Defendant No.1 undertakes to refrain from using the impugned marks ‘SPARROW’/

¶23

for manufacturing, exporting, importing, selling, offering for sale and/or dealing in tag fasteners including tag pins and loop pins and/or any allied or cognate goods used in sewing and garment industry in any manner, which would amount to infringement of Plaintiffs’ trademarks as aforementioned and copyright and/or passing off. It is also agreed that Defendant No.1 shall pay a sum of Rs. 1.5 lakhs as notional damages to the Plaintiffs within 10 days from today. Parties have also agreed that Authorised Representative of Defendant No.1 shall remove the products from the impugned packaging and will destroy the same in the presence of representatives/counsel of the Plaintiffs on 02.04.2026 at 11:00 AM.

¶24

Accordingly, in light of the settlement between the parties, this suit is decreed in terms of paragraph 35(a), (b) and (c) of the plaint.

¶25

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.

¶26

CS(COMM) 539/2024

¶27

Page 2 of 3

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:33:40

¶30

Suit is disposed of along with pending applications.

¶31

Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire Court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870.

¶32

O.A. 126/2025

¶33

In view of the decree passed, the Appellant does not press the appeal and the same is disposed of as not pressed.

¶34

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶35

FEBRUARY 17, 2026/ RW

¶36

CS(COMM) 539/2024

¶37

Page 3 of 3

¶38

This is a digitally signed order.

¶39

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:33:40

M/S Jay Plastic Company & Ors. v. M/S. Gurunanak Enterprises & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Jay Plastic Company & Ors. v. M/S. Gurunanak Enterprises & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cipla Health Limited Vs Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corp & Anr. Vs Mr Saandiip Paatil & Ors.

Shri Sunil Kumar Jain & Anr. Vs Shri Anil Kumar Jain

Aaa Infosystem Private Limited through Its Authorized Representative Mr Madhusudan Nair Vs Rma Estates and Industries Private Limited

M/S Karan Healthcare Private Limited Vs M/S Goga Healthcare

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Krs Multipro Private Limited & Anr.

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Tapovan Foods Private Limited

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Spice Nest Impex Private Limited

Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corp & Anr. Vs Mr Saandiip Paatil & Ors.

Colonel Dhyan Mayadas Retired Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rohin Gupta Proprietor of R.G Furnishing Andanr Vs Seasons Furnishing Limited and Anr.

Vorion Distilleries Inc. Vs Bacardi and Company Limited & Anr.

Glaxo Group Limited Vs Qpharm Health Care Limited and Anr.

Alu Wrap India Private Limited Vs Registrar of Trade Marks