Fdc Limited v. Palsons Derma Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Trademark suit CS(COMM) 487/2023, Delhi High Court, decided 21 January 2026 by Justice Amit Bansal. FDC Limited (plaintiff, counsel Ritwik Marwaha) versus Palsons Derma Private Limited (defendant, counsel Dhruv Sikka). Compromise recorded under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC (I.A. 1611/2026); suit decreed in terms of paragraphs 32(a) and (b) of the plaint; destruction of infringing products and removal of online/offline references to infringing marks; withdrawal of rectification petition no.279835 against registered trademark 'KROMALITE' (application no.2870414); reliefs in paragraphs 32(d)-(f) of the plaint given up; 50% court fee refund certificate under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870. No precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed by consent in terms of paragraph 32(a) and (b) of the plaint; defendant to destroy infringing products and remove online/offline references of infringing marks (paragraphs 5(d) and (e) of the application); defendant to withdraw rectification petition no.279835 within one week; reliefs in paragraphs 32(d), (e) and (f) given up; decree sheet to be drawn up; certificate of refund of 50% court fees to plaintiff under Section 16A, Court Fees Act, 1870.