Rajiv Jain v. Shri Ram Industries
Case brief
What is this about?
Rajiv Jain v. Shri Ram Industries, CS(COMM) 135/2017, Delhi High Court, Jyoti Singh J., decided 06.04.2026 — suit over trademark SUHANA (Class 11) disposed of by consent decree on joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 r/w Section 151 CPC (I.A. 8991/2026); Defendant acknowledged Plaintiff's proprietary rights in SUHANA and Registration No. 572598 (no rectification), undertook permanent restraint from SUHANA/SHYAM SUHANA or deceptively similar marks in Class 11, copyright infringement and passing off, and no future Class 11 electric products bearing the marks; Rs. 20 lakhs payable on breach; decree in terms of paras 26(a)-26(c) of plaint; refund of entire court fees under Court Fees Act, 1870; decree sheet; interim injunction of 05.12.2014; JR hearing 08.04.2026 cancelled.
What did the court decide?
Consent decree of the suit in terms of paragraph 26(a) to 26(c) of the plaint read with the settlement terms incorporated in I.A. No. 8991/2026 (Defendant acknowledges Plaintiff's proprietary rights in SUHANA Class 11 and Registration No. 572598; undertakes to permanently refrain from using SUHANA/SHYAM SUHANA or deceptively similar marks in Class 11, from copyright infringement/passing off, and from manufacturing future Class 11 electric products bearing the marks; liable to pay Rs. 20 lakhs on breach of any undertaking); Registry directed to draw up decree sheet; Plaintiff granted refund of entire court fees under the Court Fees Act, 1870; date of 08.04.2026 before Joint Registrar cancelled.