Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ashok Kumar Vs Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Delhi HC
2026
Ashok Kumar Vs Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr.Ashok Kumar v. Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr.

Dismissed¶15

Ashok Kumar v. Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr.

Delhi HC12 May 2026CRL.REV.P./690/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ashok Kumar v. Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr. | CRL.REV.P. 690/2014 | CRL.M.A. 17686/2014 | High Court of Delhi | Justice Girish Kathpalia | revision petition dismissed as withdrawn | withdrawal permitted on mentioning | revisionist had faced complete sentence awarded by impugned orders | respondents appeared through none | order dated 12.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the revision petition was granted; the petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn. ¶15

Why is it important?

The revision petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn, as requested by learned counsel for the revisionist. ¶15

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the revision petition was granted; the petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn.

Issue for consideration

Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the revision petition, the revisionist having faced the complete sentence awarded by the impugned orders.

Court's answer

The revision petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn, as requested by learned counsel for the revisionist.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia), order dated 12.05.2026, in CRL.REV.P. 690/2014 & CRL.M.A. 17686/2014 (Ashok Kumar v. Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr.). Taken up on mentioning, learned counsel for the revisionist sought permission to withdraw the revision petition, stating that the revisionist had faced the complete sentence awarded by way of the impugned orders. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issue was adjudicated; no statute or precedent is cited.

A

$~13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- CRL.REV.P. 690/2014 & CRL.M.A. 17686/2014

ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner

Through: Mohd. Mubeen, Advocate.

versus

SUNIL KUMAR GARG & ANR .....Respondents

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 12.05.2026

Matter taken up on mentioning.

Learned counsel for revisionist seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition stating that the revisionist has faced the complete sentence awarded by way of the impugned orders.

As requested, the petition and accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

MAY 12, 2026/ ry

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2026 at 11:17:39

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the revision petition, the revisionist having faced the complete sentence awarded by the impugned orders.¶14
The court held
The revision petition and the accompanying application were dismissed as withdrawn, as requested by learned counsel for the revisionist.ratio¶15

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Orders by which sentence was awarded against the revisionist; per counsel, the revisionist has faced the complete sentence awarded by way of these impugned orders. Forum and date of the impugned orders are not stated in the text.¶14
Prior proceeding
The matter was taken up on mentioning at the hearing of 12.05.2026.¶13
Prior proceeding
Learned counsel for the revisionist sought permission to withdraw the revision petition, stating that the revisionist had faced the complete sentence awarded by the impugned orders.¶14

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR¶4
Mohd. Mubeen
respondent
SUNIL KUMAR GARG & ANR.¶7

Coram

AI extract

GIRISH KATHPALIAauthor¶10

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 12 May 2026 · May
Registered: 15 Nov 2014
Case no.: CRL.REV.P./690/2014
CNR: DLHC012073682014
Bench: Girish Kathpalia
Case type: CRL.REV.P.

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Girish Kathpalia

Ajay Gupta and Ors. Vs the State Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
11 May 2026
Rakesh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
11 May 2026Writ Petition (Criminal)
MD Ishteyak & Ors. Vs State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
11 May 2026
Monoj Godha Vs Kathleen Shourie
12 May 2026
Tejinder Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
12 May 2026
Ajay Sharma Vs State NCT of Delhi
12 May 2026

Cite this judgement

Ashok Kumar v. Sunil Kumar Garg & Anr., CRL.REV.P./690/2014 (DEL), decided on 12 May 2026.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

Orders by which sentence was awarded against the revisionist; per counsel, the revisionist has faced the complete sentence awarded by way of these impugned orders. Forum and date of the impugned orders are not stated in the text.
The matter was taken up on mentioning at the hearing of 12.05.2026.
Learned counsel for the revisionist sought permission to withdraw the revision petition, stating that the revisionist had faced the complete sentence awarded by the impugned orders.

View full history

Bench / Coram

GIRISH KATHPALIA

Parties & counsel