Revision petition against trial proceedings became infructuous after the petitioner was acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts; the High Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
GOVIND SINGH BISHT .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Angad Patel, Proxy Counsel. versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 09.01.2026
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JANUARY 9, 2026/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/01/2026 at 12:59:20
Govind Singh Bisht
State (NCT of Delhi)
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
