Writ petition withdrawn at the petitioner's request; dismissed as withdrawn with pending applications disposed of. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
BHAGWAN DAS SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Counsel (appearance not given)
versus
THE STATE AND ORS. & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (CRL) with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh and Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh Sengar, Advs. for State of NCT of Delhi. (Through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 15.07.2026
MADHU JAIN, J.
JULY 15, 2026/b/Av
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:49:26
Bhagwan Das Sharma
The State and Ors.
Anr.
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
