Appellant sought withdrawal of its appeal against the Appellate Tribunal's decision, stating the penalty had been remitted. The court confirmed the impugned judgment and consigned the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-9
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Priya Ranjan and Ms. Aayushi, Advocates.
versus
ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
O R D E R % 16.04.2026
withdraw the appeal as the penalty imposed by the Appellate
Tribunal has been remitted and that there is no other point to be
decided in the appeal.
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
APRIL 16, 2026/mj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:53:39
Oriental Architectionics Ltd.
Enforcement Directorate
Chandrasekharan Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
