The petition under Section 528 BNS for quashing an FIR was dismissed as withdrawn when counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw, following the state prosecutor's submission that the petitioners were not named in the chargesheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Advocate. Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
CRL.M.C. 7918/2025 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 11:34:12
petition as far as the present petitions are concerned.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 20, 2026
‘B/JM’/
CRL.M.C. 7918/2025 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 11:34:12
2 provisions across 2 enactments
YOGENDER SISODIA & ORS.
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
