Mohd Saeed v. State Gnct of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(CRL) 633/2026, High Court of Delhi, decided 22.05.2026 by Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. Four-week parole allowed for elderly (about 70 years) TADA convict Mohd Saeed / Mohd. Sayed s/o Abdul Rashid against GNCTD/jail-authorities parole denial of 09.01.2026; grounds: 30+ years judicial custody, remission of almost 02 years, 20 prior paroles (2005–2025) borne out by nominal roll, 'satisfactory' jail conduct, punishments already served, age-related diseases, wish to spend Eid in Hapur, U.P. Statutory basis: Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. Key terms: Rs. 25,000/- personal bond with one family-member surety, Hapar-free confinement to District Hapur U.P., Wednesday reporting to S.H.O. P.S. Hapur 11:00–11:30 am, active cellphone with S.H.O. P.S. Connaught Place, passport surrender, surrender on expiry. Keywords: parole; TADA convict; life imprisonment; remission; nominal roll; Article 226; BNSS section 528; GNCTD; Jail Superintendent; Eid; elderly prisoner.